In the cities full of life, democratic voices should be heard. However, due to the corrupt party leaders like Ghulam Murtaza the foundations of the UK electoral system have been destroyed. Councillor Ghulam Murtaza is a corrupt member of the UK Labor party. He got himself involved in a complex plot of lies and frauds as he was caught up in voting frauds and corruption scandals. Murtaza, has been tricking the valid exercise of the right to vote and has been benefiting himself and his favored party members.
Voter Suppression Fraud in 2001 General Elections
The allegations of the fraudulent acts of Ghulam Murtaza came to light after he got involved in voting fraud in the 2001 general elections. Murtaza made small appearances during different times in the 2001 local elections. He also got a lot of automatic media coverage when he claimed to become a brilliant leader for the public. However, his corruption scandals were revealed by the media during the elections.
After the news came out in the media, the citizens and his supporters went on to dig deeper into the corruption scandals that he was involved in. Councillor Murtaza is spreading negativity with his involvement in various voting scandals and this has resulted in the public reacting negatively.
Murtaza is one of the most skillful suppression artists in the world. He has been involved in a voter scheme. His team members have been defying the norms of the voting process in the 2005 and 2001 general elections. Ghulam strategically placed his supporters as monitors and watchdogs in different polling stations.
He also bribed people to bring people in favor of his movement. Ghulam built many strategies of intimidation, and misinformation campaigns and even used physical force to force people to vote in his favor. He also tried to somehow silence certain people so that they wouldn’t go to vote in the elections.
Ballot Box Tempering and Suppressing Voters at Voting Stations in 2005 Elections
Voter suppression is another insult to the right to vote. It makes a person helpless during the voting procedure. Councillor Murtaza stooped so low that he was even involved in ballot box tempering. Murtaza carried out his dirty scheme and changed the packs of ballots with fake votes. These counterfeit votes were gradually replaced with the original ones in the system. It changed the results in favor of the leader.
The Manipulation of Intrinsic Voting Machines and Voter Impersonation
The purpose of electronic electoral systems in this digital era is to ensure smooth control of proceedings and make them as error-free as possible. Nevertheless, there can be cases of exploitation as political leaders like Councilor Murtaza have used them in their favor. With his hacking talent and backhand communication, his team members entered the systems clandestinely. The team changed some vote counts and artificially skewed the voting results with the push of a button.
Murtaza is an ardent politician and he went out of his way to achieve his goal even taking the voter impersonation route which is a worst act. With faked documents and fake voting IDs, his team successfully simulated multiple voting. The conspiracy was a serious question of the integrity of the national elections. This had a high probability of discouraging voters from trusting the voting system again.
Involving in Bribery and Buying Votes
Cllr Ghulam Murtaza has been involved in almost all types of voting fraud to date. His team members also bribed people into buying votes. He even went on to intimidate others to secure his win. It is the right of every citizen to cast a vote of their own will. Cllr Ghulam and other party members who have been pulling strings to do things in their favor are a bad name to the UK Politics.
It is a must for the public to retrieve democracy and get away from the claws of corruption. Corrupt leaders like Cllr Ghulam are interrupting the voting results and don’t let the voting systems be clean and transparent. It is important to safeguard the electoral process and punish leaders like Councillor Ghulam Murtaza so that the UK democratic system can be maintained.